ISS Meeting Minutes - November 8, 2003
|
Below are the unapproved ISSS minutes. Please send additions or corrections directly to me, not to the ISS Exchange. Philip L. Moss philipmoss@juno.com ************************** ISS Meeting Minutes November 8, 2003 - Cahokia Mounds, Illinois Called to order at 10:06 am. Total attendance: 16 1. Introduction of Directors and Officers. President: Philip Moss Recording Secretary: Lea Claycomb Vice-President/Director: Jack Wood Director: Tony Schmitt Director: Gary Resch Director: Steve Taylor (absent) Director: Rick Haley Director: Kevin Berdak IDNR Director: Diane Tecic 2. Moss moves: The minutes of the September 6, 2003 meeting are approved. Wood seconds. Discussion re: approval vs. Don Coon’s request for making a motion to change minutes. Board feels that it is an unfortunate misrepresentation, but feels it is an accurate account of what happened at the meeting. For: the rest Against: none Abstain: Haley Motion approved 3. Report on data requests President. No new data requests at this time and there have been none since last meeting. Schmitt will contact Jim Sherrell re: map. Old Business 4. Report on ESRI software maintenance grant Aaron Addison: not present. Tony Schmitt now holds the ISS' ESRI software as of now. Moss asks for volunteers to persue maintenance grant. Decided to pursue only if someone takes it on. 5. Wood moves: The ISS/SNF project shall move forward on an unofficial basis. Schmitt seconds. Discussion by Wood on the motion. To get grant ISS needs to present tax number. Also funds used can not be used for acquisition of equipment (computers, GPS units etc.) The hope is that they will be able to provide us with maps. For: all Against: none Motion approved New Business 6. Moss moves: Diane Tecic is elected to the Data Request Committee. Diane Tecic is nominated for DRC. Resch moves to close nominations Schmitt seconds. For: all Against: none Diane Tecic is elected to the DRC. 7. Wood moves: The member applicants listed below are confirmed as ISS members. Schmitt seconds: Wood moves to amend: Rodney Raber, Richard Raber, and Jim Ruedin are added to the list. Schmitt seconds. For 6 Against: none Amendment approved Wood asks if anyone would like to review applications. Harry Hendrickson - (IDNR) Springfield, IL Richard Orr - St. Charles, MO Gary Gibula - Warrenville, IL Ted Mueller - Chester, IL Dianna Mueller - Chester, IL Lea Claycomb - Columbia, MO Myron Mugele - New Baden, IL Teresa Russin - Carbondale, IL Marc Stamborski - South Holland, IL Jeffery Gosnell - Lacon, IL John Marquart - Charleston, IL Jeff Weston - Warrenville, IL Joe Sikorski - St. Louis, MO Judith Halter - Anna, IL Kimberly Chiles - Arnold, MO Don Coons - Rutland, IL Debbie Newman - (IDNR) Ava, IL Valerie Schmidt - Fenton, MO Richard Raber Effingham, IL Rodney Raber Effingham, IL Jim Ruedin Eureka, MO For: all Against: none Motion approved 7A) Wood moves: Fred Schumann is confirmed as a member of the ISS (This motion was separate because Wood did not bring any supporting documentation.) For: all Against: None Motion approved 10:41 Moss moves for a Recess to permit the Vice-President and President to count votes. 15 min 11:01 reconvene Elections 8. Director election results Jack Wood Winners are Jim Sherrell, Steve Taylor, Diane Tecic, Jack Wood, Gary Resch, and Tony Schmitt The point is made that Diane Tecic cannot serve as an elected director and IDNR Director. This will be resolved by the next meeting. 9. Moss moves: Procedures for data requests are adopted. Moss summarizes changes to procedures Data Request Procedures 1) Data requests may be submitted to any member of the Data Request Committee (DRC) or to any Officer or Director of the ISS. Requests not made to a member of the DRC shall be forwarded to a member of the DRC. 2) The member of the DRC first receiving the data request shall first determine if the data request involves sensitive data (information that could easily lead to the location of a cave entrance) or if it comes from an entity that has a relevant Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the ISS. If the request does not involve sensitive data, then the request should be immediately granted. The DRC member making the determination of non-sensitive data shall notify a Data Custodian to release the requested data. No confidentiality agreement is required, although the ISS would like acknowledgement in reports or presentations incorporating data provided. 3) If the request comes from an entity with an MOU that addresses data access, the terms of the MOU take precedence over these procedures. Data requests made under the terms of an MOU shall be reported to the President along with all other data requests. 4) The DRC may wish to determine whether the data requested is held by the ISS. Requests for data not held by the ISS do not require deliberation. If it becomes known that the ISS does not hold all the requested data, then the requestor shall be notified as soon as possible. 5) If the data is deemed sensitive, then all material supporting the request shall be distributed to the rest of the DRC. The request shall not be granted by the DRC without unanimous approval by the DRC. If any member of the DRC believes that it is inappropriate for DRC to make a determination (absent members, conflict of interest, or a request for substantial quantities of data), then the request shall be referred to the Board of Directors for consideration. 6) If the DRC approves the request, but it includes data restricted by the data donor, the request and supporting materials shall be forwarded to the restricting person(s) for their consideration along with notification of the DRC’s unanimous support of the request. 7) If the person restricting the data approves the request, the restrictor shall notify the DRC and the Data Custodian and sign the confidentiality agreement. The confidentiality agreement language must be satisfactory to any person releasing restricted data. 8) If any member of the DRC disapproves of the data request, then the Chair of the DRC or his designee shall notify the requestor and inform the requestor that the decision may be appealed to the Board of Directors. If an appeal is desired, the DRC Chair will notify the President and forward the supporting material. The President will then place the request on the next meeting agenda. 9) A simple majority is required to approve a data request brought before the Board of Directors. The results of the vote shall be recorded in the minutes. If passed, the President will notify the Data Custodian to release the data with an appropriate confidentiality agreement to be signed by the President. The DRC does not need to sign confidentiality agreements for data releases approved by the Board of Directors. 10) If a DRC member is requesting sensitive data, then that member should abstain from voting on the request. If two or more DRC members are involved with the data request, then the request shall be referred to the Board of Directors. 11) The DRC shall appoint one of its members as Chair. The Chair shall report on the activity of the DRC to the President each month. The report will include a record of who voted how and a description of materials provided by and requested from the data requestor. These records will be made available to ISS members and anyone making a data request. 12) The DRC Chair or his designee shall draft a Confidentiality Agreement that is appropriate for each approved data request. The DRC Chair shall obtain each DRC member’s signature on each confidentiality agreement for sensitive data released. The signatures document their approval of the request. 13) If a data request involves both sensitive and non-sensitive data, the DRC will indicate only the sensitive data on the confidentiality agreement. The non-sensitive data may be released prior to a decision on sensitive data. 14) If the DRC or the Board of Directors approves a grant request for data not held by the ISS, the approval is moot. If and when the data is submitted to the ISS, the requestor must make a new request. Schmitt seconds. Discussion: Moss explains need for procedures. This does not change the bylaws. Board may override this, DRC may not. Discussion: Re: possible conflicts between bylaws and these procedures. Tecic reminds board about forms for Data Requests (this is on the website). Resch mentions the variety of ways states manage cave/spring data. Haley requests clarification of procedure number 12, which was done. Clarification is made that if a person turns in data and then requests it back, that is allowed due to ownership. Clarification is made that the confidentiality agreement shall be drafted to support specific each specific request. Haley states he feels procedures are too restrictive. For: all Against: none Motion approved 10. Moss moves: A period for open discussion of topics of general interest to the membership will be held for 20 minutes. Wood seconds For: all Against: None Motion approved to discuss until 12:20 -Schmitt has a sinkhole clean up on Dec. 13th in S. Monroe Co. There is mapping potential. Camping onsite. If interested please e-mail Tony Schmitt |
ISS main page
Please email sjtaylor@inhs.uiuc.edu with web page comments and corrections. All other correspondence should be addressed to the ISS via the president. |